Thursday, June 13, 2013

A Thin Line between Love and Lust

It’s better than beautiful
It’s like knowing god exist w/out site
That rhythm that flows between your legs right before you begin to climax
That feel so good all you can do is cry but that’s not even enough

It’s like I can feel your heart beating 10 miles away and although it’s a saying
It’s as real as it can be; you touched me

It’s what your heart desires and then some
Unexplainable, unimaginable, irresistible feeling
You have no control over


Sex isn't better than love its better with love
But there is a thin line between love and lust

So how do you know that you are in love? How do you really know that you are not in lust when sex is the clouded judgment?


A lot of people mistake love for lust especially when the sex is good. I mean think about it, you ever been so physically attracted to someone that when you have been intimate with them you come out feeling like you are in love and the more you have sex the more in “Love” you say you are?  Do you already see the difference?

The more you have sex, the more in love you think you are? But we know that sex is not love; right? We know that sex is a desire. The definition for lust is to have an overwhelming sexual desire for someone. To love is to have a romantic or sexual attachment. To desire is the physical but it can feel emotional when adding it to sex; thus creating the illusion of love. I mean after all, love includes sexual and romantic to the equation.  To be attached is the emotional. If you lust someone, then you are attracted to them physically; that’s it! There is nothing else.  It’s an overwhelming attraction so everything else seems so much better.  In that sense that would mean that the connection during sex would be intense because of how attracted you are. I describe sex with lust as an added sedative to a hallucinogen to intensify the main effect. To hallucinate is to see an image that is not there. Humans believe in what they see, which shows that we believe in what we feel and therefor if we say we are then we are and most times the fallacy in this reality seems so much better… but it’s just that; not real. If it was real then you wouldn't have to add anything to it.

No watch this, Love is the emotion. Emotional attachments include not just the physical but the mental and spiritual aspect between you and your partner. Love is all things combined and thus is intensified within its own self. So in the case that sex is the additive to the hallucinogen, which would be lust, that intensifies and love being intensity within itself means that the felling would in fact be much greater.  In love you don’t need the sex; you want the sex.  

Simply put, love includes lust and lust excludes love, thus making sex with love the better feeling.
The question that a remains is, “are you in love or in lust when sex is the clouded judgment?”

 The deciding question is, “if you could never, ever, ever, have sex with this person, would you still love them?”  


There is a thin line between love and lust… What side of the line are you on?

2 comments: